<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Speed up WordPress on IIS 7.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ruslany.net/2008/12/speed-up-wordpress-on-iis-70/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ruslany.net/2008/12/speed-up-wordpress-on-iis-70/</link>
	<description>IIS, FastCGI, PHP and other interesting stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:10:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DigitalStudio</title>
		<link>http://ruslany.net/2008/12/speed-up-wordpress-on-iis-70/comment-page-2/#comment-11508</link>
		<dc:creator>DigitalStudio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 04:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruslany.net/?p=136#comment-11508</guid>
		<description>Hi. I followed your post to setup WP super cache on one of our WP (3.1) sites on IIS 7.5. We noticed once the page views went over 15K pageviews per hour, the site become almost unresponsive. Have you experienced such issues? Caching works really good up to that point though... I&#039;d like to hear your thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. I followed your post to setup WP super cache on one of our WP (3.1) sites on IIS 7.5. We noticed once the page views went over 15K pageviews per hour, the site become almost unresponsive. Have you experienced such issues? Caching works really good up to that point though&#8230; I&#8217;d like to hear your thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hector</title>
		<link>http://ruslany.net/2008/12/speed-up-wordpress-on-iis-70/comment-page-2/#comment-11393</link>
		<dc:creator>Hector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 06:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruslany.net/?p=136#comment-11393</guid>
		<description>Hi I know this post is a bit old but I have found it very useful anyway. My only question is, I don&#039;t think or see the rewrite rule attempts to send the gzip version if available? I know Super Cache is creating the HTML and the GZIP version for every cached file, but it always sends the uncompressed one. Any ideas how to tweak the rule to try the compressed version first?

I was using Total Cache on Linux but now we had to move to Windows and since this is the only tutorial I found that worked and I have zero experience in writing IIS rules, I had to switch to Super Cache. The only thing I miss is the minification which I preferred than using a separate WP Minify.

Anyway, any help with the Gzip rule would be greatly appreciated!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi I know this post is a bit old but I have found it very useful anyway. My only question is, I don&#8217;t think or see the rewrite rule attempts to send the gzip version if available? I know Super Cache is creating the HTML and the GZIP version for every cached file, but it always sends the uncompressed one. Any ideas how to tweak the rule to try the compressed version first?</p>
<p>I was using Total Cache on Linux but now we had to move to Windows and since this is the only tutorial I found that worked and I have zero experience in writing IIS rules, I had to switch to Super Cache. The only thing I miss is the minification which I preferred than using a separate WP Minify.</p>
<p>Anyway, any help with the Gzip rule would be greatly appreciated!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ruslany</title>
		<link>http://ruslany.net/2008/12/speed-up-wordpress-on-iis-70/comment-page-2/#comment-11178</link>
		<dc:creator>ruslany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruslany.net/?p=136#comment-11178</guid>
		<description>Hi Sahil,

Since the time I wrote this article there are other caching plugins became available which are designed to work well with IIS. I would recommend to take a look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/w3-total-cache/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;W3 Total Cache&lt;/a&gt;, which has been tested with IIS and also supports WinCache.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sahil,</p>
<p>Since the time I wrote this article there are other caching plugins became available which are designed to work well with IIS. I would recommend to take a look at <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/w3-total-cache/" rel="nofollow">W3 Total Cache</a>, which has been tested with IIS and also supports WinCache.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sahil</title>
		<link>http://ruslany.net/2008/12/speed-up-wordpress-on-iis-70/comment-page-2/#comment-11103</link>
		<dc:creator>sahil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 10:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruslany.net/?p=136#comment-11103</guid>
		<description>Hello ruslany,

I was going through this article ,
As i also want to implement the same but the issue is that I have already written some rules in web.config for permalink structure but how to go abt implement only super cache stuff

Kindly respond asap</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello ruslany,</p>
<p>I was going through this article ,<br />
As i also want to implement the same but the issue is that I have already written some rules in web.config for permalink structure but how to go abt implement only super cache stuff</p>
<p>Kindly respond asap</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hayden</title>
		<link>http://ruslany.net/2008/12/speed-up-wordpress-on-iis-70/comment-page-2/#comment-7182</link>
		<dc:creator>Hayden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 01:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruslany.net/?p=136#comment-7182</guid>
		<description>As per Output caching issues can CacheUntilChange help?

CacheUntilChange detects a change to the underlying resource.

Read about it here:
http://learn.iis.net/page.aspx/710/configure-iis-7-output-caching/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As per Output caching issues can CacheUntilChange help?</p>
<p>CacheUntilChange detects a change to the underlying resource.</p>
<p>Read about it here:<br />
<a href="http://learn.iis.net/page.aspx/710/configure-iis-7-output-caching/" rel="nofollow">http://learn.iis.net/page.aspx/710/configure-iis-7-output-caching/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hayden</title>
		<link>http://ruslany.net/2008/12/speed-up-wordpress-on-iis-70/comment-page-1/#comment-7177</link>
		<dc:creator>Hayden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 23:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruslany.net/?p=136#comment-7177</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just thinking we get around 50,000 page views per day and we use Quick Cache which is a lot faster than WP Super Cache. Of course, it caches to DISK.

IIS Output cache would cache to Memory. I&#039;m thinking it might be performance improvement to enable both? Enabling output cache to cache for say 10 seconds?

Does output cache remove files based on least used/hits or does it remove files just based on last access? I guess if IIS Output cache at say 10 - 30 seconds can be filled with only the most used pages then it could make sense to enabled both on busy site.

Any thoughts, clarifications, suggestions on running both so that cache is delivered from memory and not disk?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just thinking we get around 50,000 page views per day and we use Quick Cache which is a lot faster than WP Super Cache. Of course, it caches to DISK.</p>
<p>IIS Output cache would cache to Memory. I&#8217;m thinking it might be performance improvement to enable both? Enabling output cache to cache for say 10 seconds?</p>
<p>Does output cache remove files based on least used/hits or does it remove files just based on last access? I guess if IIS Output cache at say 10 &#8211; 30 seconds can be filled with only the most used pages then it could make sense to enabled both on busy site.</p>
<p>Any thoughts, clarifications, suggestions on running both so that cache is delivered from memory and not disk?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hayden</title>
		<link>http://ruslany.net/2008/12/speed-up-wordpress-on-iis-70/comment-page-1/#comment-6913</link>
		<dc:creator>Hayden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 05:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruslany.net/?p=136#comment-6913</guid>
		<description>Thanks read it and understand. I now use Quick Cache with Wincache enabled = awesomeness</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks read it and understand. I now use Quick Cache with Wincache enabled = awesomeness</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ruslany</title>
		<link>http://ruslany.net/2008/12/speed-up-wordpress-on-iis-70/comment-page-1/#comment-6869</link>
		<dc:creator>ruslany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruslany.net/?p=136#comment-6869</guid>
		<description>Conceptually, the wp-super-cache is somewhat similar to IIS output cache. The explainations of how those compare to wincache is &lt;a href=&quot;http://ruslany.net/2009/09/windows-cache-extension-1-0-for-php-beta/#comment-1359&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conceptually, the wp-super-cache is somewhat similar to IIS output cache. The explainations of how those compare to wincache is <a href="http://ruslany.net/2009/09/windows-cache-extension-1-0-for-php-beta/#comment-1359" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hayden</title>
		<link>http://ruslany.net/2008/12/speed-up-wordpress-on-iis-70/comment-page-1/#comment-6862</link>
		<dc:creator>Hayden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruslany.net/?p=136#comment-6862</guid>
		<description>Is this to be used WITH wincache? Or does wincache replace wp-super-cache?

thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this to be used WITH wincache? Or does wincache replace wp-super-cache?</p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francesco Cosentino</title>
		<link>http://ruslany.net/2008/12/speed-up-wordpress-on-iis-70/comment-page-1/#comment-1957</link>
		<dc:creator>Francesco Cosentino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 13:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruslany.net/?p=136#comment-1957</guid>
		<description>A good post. 
I&#039;m using WordPress running under IIS7.5 with MS SQL Server 2008 x64 as database.
I prefer to flag the file notification change option, this setting prevents the missing confirmation message when posting new data.
I suggest you to prevent caching under the wp-admin directory! This could help ;)
Let me know and visit our blog!
F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good post.<br />
I&#8217;m using WordPress running under IIS7.5 with MS SQL Server 2008 x64 as database.<br />
I prefer to flag the file notification change option, this setting prevents the missing confirmation message when posting new data.<br />
I suggest you to prevent caching under the wp-admin directory! This could help <img src='http://ruslany.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Let me know and visit our blog!<br />
F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

